English عربي فارسی Русский TÜRKÇE
Arabic Farsi Russian Turkish

The Holocaust: Denial & History

barbed wire

The Nazi Holocaust claimed the lives of between 5 and 6 million Jews between 1939 and 1945. Since then, a small group of Holocaust deniers have lied about and minimized this history by deliberately manipulating historical evidence as part of an ideological and racist agenda.

Learning Tools: Myths & Facts


Holocaust deniers freely distort the historical record in order to justify anti-Semitism, racism and fascism. These tools help the novice and expert alike analyze denier claims and refute them with historical evidence including primary-source documents and both Nazi and survivor testimony.

Irving v. Lipstadt: Denial on Trial


In 1996 British Holocaust denier David Irving sued professor Deborah Lipstadt for alleged libel. Three courts found for Lipstadt concluding that Irving was a Holocaust denier, an anti-Semite and a racist. The unedited trial documents found below document this important victory for truth and history.

Continuing Effort: News & Updates


Holocaust denial suffered a sharp blow as a result of the Irving v. Lipstadt trial, however deniers and so-called "revisionists" continue to publicize their ideologically skewed version of history. We provide up-to-date news, links and resources on denial and its continued impact on culture.

Holocaust Denial in the News



The links below demonstrate the ongoing struggle over the history and memory of the Holocaust. They appear based on keyword searches of current news articles and are neither selected nor endorsed by HDOT.


Channel 4 buys lock of Hitler's hair from Holocaust denier in ''sick and ...
Furious critics have slammed Channel 4 for paying Holocaust denier David Irving thousands of pounds for a lock of Hitler's hair. Bosses paid the reviled historian £3,000 for the snipping so they can have DNA tests carried out on it for a new show.
British TV Lambasted for Buying a 'Lock of Hitler's Hair'Arutz Sheva

all 2 news articles »

Daily Mail

Channel 4 under fire after paying Holocaust-denying historian £3000 for a lock ...
Daily Mail
Channel 4 has been labelled tawdry after paying Holocaust denier David Irving £3,000 for what he says is a lock of Adolf Hitler's hair. The strand will be DNA-tested in a TV show to be broadcast this week. Labour MP Ian Austin – whose Jewish father ...
Dead Famous DNA: C4 Buys Hitler Hair from Holocaust Denier David IrvingInternational Business Times UK
Holocaust-denying historian cashes in from Hitler's hairHaaretz
Channel 4 buys Hitler's hair from David Irving for £3000Jewish Chronicle
Boston.com -Irish Independent
all 10 news articles »

Holocaust-Denier David Irving makes $5000 selling lock of Hitler's hair
History News Network
How about notorious Holocaust denier David Irving? The British 'historian' was once found guilty of Holocaust denial in an Austrian court, called an “anti-Semitic” “racist” who “associates with right-wing extremists who promote neo-Nazism” in a British ...


Online Holocaust Denial and Hate Podcast Series:

barbed wireHDOT's new podcast recordings feature interviews with Dr. Saul Friedlander, Father John Pawlikowski and other leading scholars and intellectuals discussing Holocaust denial and online hate speech. Subscribe to the feed in iTunes to receive new podcasts as we post them.



Further Reading:


Controversy at Harvard: Muslim Chaplain Suggests Death of Muslim Apostates?, May 2, 2009


For the past two weeks a controversy has been brewing at Harvard as reported by the Harvard Crimson. Recently it has also been covered in the Forward.

In short, the Muslim chaplain, Abdul-Basser wrote the following to a Muslim student:

great wisdom (hikma) associated with the established and preserved position (capital punishment [for apostates]) and so, even if it makes some uncomfortable in the face of the hegemonic modern human rights discourse, one should not dismiss it out of hand.”
In the Crimson article a number of Muslim students were quoted as being quite critical of his stand. He claims that he has been misinterpreted and was not saying that he supports death for converts from Islam. It's hard how to see otherwise, particular in light of his comment about "hegemonic modern human rights discourse."

He, of course, is free to have any religious view he wishes. It is just disturbing to think that this is the point of view being imparted to students.